New articles relating to General Sedation

Tom D, Reeves S. Pediatric Procedural Sedation. Pediatr Ann. 2024 Sep;53(9):e324-e329. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20240703-06. Epub 2024 Sep 1. PMID: 39240178.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
Pediatric procedural sedation (PPS), formerly known as conscious sedation, is often used outside the operating room for various procedures. Twenty years ago, nearly all cases of PPS were performed by pediatric intensivists, dentists, emergency medicine physicians, and anesthesiologists, due to the urgent nature of procedures in their settings. However, with the emergence of pediatric hospital medicine as a board-certified subspecialty, many children’s hospitals have created dedicated PPS teams. These teams, composed of highly trained physicians and ancillary staff, are well-suited for procedures, quality measures, and multidisciplinary care. The wider availability of sedation outside the operating room allows other pediatric subspecialties, such as surgery and oncology, to use PPS in ensuring safe and timely interventions for their patients. This article will cover PPS as an alternative to anesthesia for otherwise healthy children and aim to answer frequent questions that arise regarding medications, risks, and candidacy for PPS.


Obara S, Kamata K, Nakao M, Yamaguchi S, Kiyama S. Recommendation for the practice of total intravenous anesthesia. J Anesth. 2024 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03398-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39217587.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
This Recommendation was developed by the Japanese Society of Intravenous Anesthesia Recommendation Making Working Group (JSIVA-WG) to promote the safe and effective practice of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), tailored to the current situation in Japan. It presents a policy validated by the members of JSIVA-WG and a review committee for practical anesthesia management. Anesthesiologists should acquire and maintain the necessary knowledge and skills to be able to administer TIVA properly. A secure venous access is critically important for TIVA. To visualize and understand the pharmacokinetics of intravenous anesthetics, use of real-time pharmacokinetic simulations is strongly recommended. Syringe pumps are essential for the infusion of intravenous anesthetics, which should be prepared according to the rules of each individual anesthesia department, particularly with regard to dilution. Syringes should be clearly labeled with content and drug concentration. When managing TIVA, particularly with the use of muscle relaxants, monitoring processed electroencephalogram (EEG) is advisable. However, the depth of sedation/anesthesia must be assessed comprehensively using various parameters, rather than simply relying on a single EEG index. TIVA should be swiftly changed to an alternative method that includes inhalation anesthesia if necessary. Use of antagonists at emergence may be associated with re-sedation risk. Casual administration of antagonists and sending patients back to surgical wards without careful observation are not acceptable.


Gardner L, Causey C, Zito A, Novosel LM. Development and Implementation of a Procedural Sedation Course for Registered Nurses. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2024 Sep-Oct 01;40(5):248-255. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000001071. Epub 2024 Jul 22. PMID: 39042848.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
Procedural sedation is the administration of medication to obtund, dull, or reduce the intensity of pain or awareness associated with a therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. Because registered nurses play a key role in ensuring patient safety during procedural sedation, it is essential they have the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe, quality care. This paper describes the development, implementation, and outcomes of a course designed for nurses providing care to patients undergoing procedural sedation.


Dhuse J, Cash T, Elges MS, Alazraki A, Beer R, Jergel A, Goldsmith KC, Hall M, Kamat PP. Trends in analgesia-sedation of pediatric patients receiving I-131 MIBG in the pediatric intensive care unit: A report from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Oct;71(10):e31205. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31205. Epub 2024 Jul 15. PMID: 39010648.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
Background: Children with neuroblastoma receiving I-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) therapy require sedation-analgesia for strict radiation safety precautions during MIBG infusion and clearance. We evaluated the sedation-analgesia trends of patients undergoing MIBG therapy using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.

Materials and methods: Retrospective data from 476 patient encounters from the PHIS from 2010 to 2019.

Results: Total 240/476 (50.45%) children evaluated were under 6 years of age. Compared to 2010, in 2018 there was a decrease in benzodiazepine infusion use (60% vs. 40%, p < .04), as well as a decrease in use of opiate infusion (35% vs. 25%, p < .001). Compared to 2010, in 2018 we report an increase in the use of ketamine (from 5% to 10%, p < .002), as well as an increase in dexmedetomidine use (0% vs. 30%, p < .001). Dexmedetomidine was the most used medication in the 0-3 years age group compared to children older than 3 years of age (14.19% vs. 5.80%, p < .001). Opiate was the most used medication in children greater than 3 years compared to the 0-3-year age group (36.23 vs. 23.87, p < .05).

Conclusion: Using PHIS data, we discovered considerable variability in the medications used for sedation in patients undergoing MIBG therapy. Although benzodiazepines and opioids were the most used agents, there was a trend toward decreasing use of benzodiazepines and opioids in these patients. Furthermore, there has been an increasing trend in the use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine.


Corn E, Andringa-Seed R, Williams ME, Arroyave-Wessel M, Tarud R, Vezina G, Podolsky RH, Kapse K, Limperopoulos C, Berl MM, Cure C, Mulkey SB. Feasibility and success of a non-sedated brain MRI training protocol in 7-year-old children from rural and semi-rural Colombia. Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Aug;54(9):1513-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05964-y. Epub 2024 Jul 6. PMID: 38970708.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
Background: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial tool for clinical evaluation of the brain and neuroscience research. Obtaining successful non-sedated MRI in children who live in resource-limited settings may be an additional challenge.

Objective: To present a feasibility study of a novel, low-cost MRI training protocol used in a clinical research study in a rural/semi-rural region of Colombia and to examine neurodevelopmental factors associated with successful scans.

Materials and methods: Fifty-seven typically developing Colombian children underwent a training protocol and non-sedated brain MRI at age 7. Group training utilized a customized booklet, an MRI toy set, and a simple mock scanner. Children attended MRI visits in small groups of two to three. Resting-state functional and structural images were acquired on a 1.5-Tesla scanner with a protocol duration of 30-40 minutes. MRI success was defined as the completion of all sequences and no more than mild motion artifact. Associations between the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI), Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) scores and MRI success were analyzed.

Results: Mean (SD) age at first MRI attempt was 7.2 (0.2) years (median 7.2 years, interquartile range 7.1-7.3 years). Twenty-six (45.6%) participants were male. Fifty-one (89.5%) children were successful across two attempts; 44 (77.2%) were successful on their first attempt. Six (10.5%) were unsuccessful due to refusal or excessive motion. Age, sex, and scores across all neurodevelopmental assessments (MABC, TVIP, ABAS, BRIEF, CBCL, NIH Toolbox Flanker, NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison, WPPSI) were not associated with likelihood of MRI success (P=0.18, 0.19, 0.38, 0.92, 0.84, 0.80, 1.00, 0.16, 0.75, 0.86, respectively).

Conclusion: This cohort of children from a rural/semi-rural region of Colombia demonstrated comparable MRI success rates to other published cohorts after completing a low-cost MRI familiarization training protocol suitable for low-resource settings. Achieving non-sedated MRI success in children in low-resource and international settings is important for the continuing diversification of pediatric research studies.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04398901.


Alexander S, Kairalla JA, Gupta S, Hibbitts E, Weisman H, Anghelescu D, Winick NJ, Krull KR, Salzer WL, Burke MJ, Gore L, Devidas M, Embry L, Raetz EA, Hunger SP, Loh ML, Hardy KK. Impact of Propofol Exposure on Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children With High-Risk B ALL: A Children’s Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;42(22):2671-2679. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01989. Epub 2024 Apr 11. PMID: 38603641.

Full text access for Children’s and Emory users.

Abstract
Purpose: Many children treated for ALL develop long-term neurocognitive impairments. Increased risk of these impairments is associated with treatment and demographic factors. Exposure to anesthesia is an additional possible risk factor. This study evaluated the impact of cumulative exposure to anesthesia on neurocognitive outcomes among a multicenter cohort of children with ALL.

Methods: This study was embedded in AALL1131, a Children’s Oncology Group phase III trial for patients with high-risk B-ALL. In consenting patients age 6-12 years, prospective uniform assessments of neurocognitive function were performed during and at 1 year after completion of therapy. Exposure to all episodes of anesthetic agents was abstracted. Multivariable linear regression models determined associations of cumulative anesthetic agents with the primary neurocognitive outcome reaction time/processing speed (age-normed) at 1 year off therapy, adjusting for baseline neurocognitive score, age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status (as a proxy for socioeconomic status), and leukemia risk group.

Results: One hundred and forty-four children, 76 (52.8%) males, mean age of 9.1 (min-max, 6.0-12.0) years at diagnosis, underwent a median of 27 anesthetic episodes (min-max, 1-37). Almost all patients were exposed to propofol (140/144, 97.2%), with a mean cumulative dose of 112.3 mg/kg. One year after therapy, the proportion of children with impairment (Z-score ≤-1.5) was significantly higher compared with a normative sample. In covariate-adjusted multivariable analysis, cumulative exposure to propofol was associated with a 0.05 Z-score decrease in reaction time/processing speed per each 10 mg/kg propofol exposure (P = .03).

Conclusion: In a multicenter and uniformly treated cohort of children with B-ALL, cumulative exposure to propofol was an independent risk factor for impairment in reaction time/processing speed 1 year after therapy. Anesthesia exposure is a modifiable risk, and opportunities to minimize propofol use should be considered.

Leave a comment